4.6 Article

Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 1201-1208

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.004

关键词

Edge chipping; Flexural fracture; Monolithic restorations; Zirconia-based ceramic; Glass-ceramic; Graded glass-zirconia

资金

  1. United States National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [2R01 DE017925]
  2. National Science Foundation [CMMI-0758530]
  3. NIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Test the hypothesis that monolithic ceramics can be developed with combined esthetics and superior fracture resistance to circumvent processing and performance drawbacks of traditional all-ceramic crowns and fixed-dental-prostheses consisting of a hard and strong core with an esthetic porcelain veneer. Specifically, to demonstrate that monolithic prostheses can be produced with a much reduced susceptibility to fracture. Methods. Protocols were applied for quantifying resistance to chipping as well as resistance to flexural failure in two classes of dental ceramic, microstructurally-modified zirconias and lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. A sharp indenter was used to induce chips near the edges of flat-layer specimens, and the results compared with predictions from a critical load equation. The critical loads required to produce cementation surface failure in monolithic specimens bonded to dentin were computed from established flexural strength relations and the predictions validated with experimental data. Results. Monolithic zirconias have superior chipping and flexural fracture resistance relative to their veneered counterparts. While they have superior esthetics, glass-ceramics exhibit lower strength but higher chip fracture resistance relative to porcelain-veneered zirconias. Significance. The study suggests a promising future for new and improved monolithic ceramic restorations, with combined durability and acceptable esthetics. (C) 2013 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据