4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of macro test methods

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 E38-E49

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150

关键词

Bond strength; Shear; Tensile; Dental adhesives; Finite element analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Bond strength between adhesive systems and the tooth structure is influenced by a large number of variables, which makes the comparison among studies virtually impossible. Also, failure often times propagates into the dental substrate or the composite, deeming the results questionable at best. In spite of the increased popularity gained by micro-tensile and micro-shear tests, in vitro evaluations using specimens with relatively large bonding areas remain frequent. This review focuses on aspects related to specimen geometry and test mechanics of macro shear and tensile bond strength tests. Methods. Besides information drawn from the literature, the effect of some parameters on stress distribution at the bonded interface was assessed using finite element analysis (FEA). Results. Bond strength tends to increase with smaller bonding areas and with the use of high elastic modulus composites. Stress concentration at the bonded interface is much more severe in shear compared to tension. Among shear methods, the use of the chisel shows the highest stress concentration. Within the limits suggested by the ISO/TS 11405, crosshead speed does not seem to influence bond strength values. Pooled data from currently available adhesives tested in either shear or tension showed 44% of adhesive failures, 31% mixed and 25% cohesive in the substrate ( tooth or composite). A comparative bond strength study involving three adhesive systems revealed similarities between macro and micro counterparts regarding material ranking, whereas macro tests presented a higher incidence of cohesive failures. Significance. Simplicity warrants macro bond strength tests an enduring popularity, in spite of their evident limitations. From a mechanical standpoint, knowing the stress distribution at the bonded interface and how it is affected by the materials and loading method used is key to explain the results. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Academy of Dental Materials. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据