4.6 Article

An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 48-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.007

关键词

Titanium implants; Surface treatment; Bioactivity; AFM; Surface topography; Functional parameters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dilute HCl as a sodium removal treatment of grit blasted/NaOH/heat treated cp titanium implants on the in vitro bioactivity and the in vivo interface shear resistance at different healing periods. Methods. Cylindrical implants were machined from cp titanium bars. Half of the implants were blasted by AL(2)O(3) particles followed NaOH/heat treatment. The other half received similar treatment except, dilute HCl was additionally used as a sodium removal treatment. implants surfaces topography was characterized by AFM before and after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF) for 3 and 7 days. The implants resistance to interfacial shear force was evaluated at 2, 4, and 8 weeks implantation periods in experimental rabbits. Results. Sodium removal treatment significantly increased surface roughness (Sa parameter), valley fluid retention index and surface area before and after immersion in SBF, however, it significantly decreased core fluid retention index. Calcium and phosphorus containing surface deposits, of larger surface area, were precipitated on implants received the sodium removal treatment after 3 and 7 days in SBF. The implant-bone interface resistance to shear force was significantly increased at 2 weeks healing period after the use of the sodium removal treatment. Significance. The sodium removal treatment showed to be effective in improving the early bone-implant interface resistance to shear force. Topographical changes, after dilute HCl etching, seem to contribute to the different in vitro and/or in vivo responses observed. (C) 2008 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据