4.6 Article

Cord Blood Vitamin D and Neurocognitive Development Are Nonlinearly Related in Toddlers

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 145, 期 6, 页码 1232-1238

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.208801

关键词

cord blood; vitamin D; 25-hydroxyvitamin D; cognitive development; infant

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472991, 81330068, 81373012]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [553043]
  3. Key Project Foundation for the Talents by Anhui Educational Commission [2013SQRL020ZD]
  4. Program for the Innovative Talents of Anhui Medical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Little is known about the relation between vitamin D status in early life and neurodevelopment outcomes. Objective: This study was designed to examine the association of cord blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] at birth with neurocognitive development in toddlers. Methods: As part of the China-Anhui Birth Cohort Study, 363 mother-infant pairs with complete data were selected. Concentrations of 25(OH)D in cord blood were measured by radioimmunoassay. Mental development index (MDI) and psychomotor development index (PDI) in toddlers were assessed at age 16-18 mo by using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. The data on maternal sociodemographic characteristics and other confounding factors were also prospectively collected. Results: Toddlers in the lowest quintile of cord blood 25(OH)D exhibited a deficit of 7.60 (95% CI: -12.4, -2.82; P= 0.002) and 8.04 (95% CI: -12.9, -3.11; P = 0.001) points in the MDI and PDI scores, respectively, compared with the reference category. Unexpectedly, toddlers in the highest quintile of cord blood 25(OH)D also had a significant deficit of 12.3 (95% CI: -17.9, -6.67; P < 0.001) points in PDI scores compared with the reference category. Conclusions: This prospective study suggested that there was an inverted-U-shaped relation between neonatal vitamin D status and neurocognitive development in toddlers. Additional studies on the optimal 25(OH)D concentrations in early life are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据