4.2 Article

Screening for Cognitive Dysfunction in Corticobasal Syndrome: Utility of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination

期刊

DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 254-258

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000327169

关键词

Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination; Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised; Corticobasal degeneration; Corticobasal syndrome; Progressive aphasia

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Medical Research Council [G0700704B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The motor features of corticobasal syndrome (CBS) are well recognized but the fact that many, if not all, affected patients develop cognitive impairment is still underrecognized. The dementia of CBS overlaps most with a language variant of frontotemporal dementia: progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA). The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in the evaluation of CBS and to document similarities and differences between CBS and PNFA. Materials and Methods: Patients with well-defined CBS or PNFA from two tertiary referral centers were selected along with matched controls. Results: Twenty-one patients with CBS, 23 patients with PNFA and 47 age-and education-matched controls were included. Both CBS and PNFA groups showed substantial impairment on the ACE-R (f = 17.3-80.2, p < 0.001) and were significantly impaired in all domains (p < 0.001). The only significant difference between CBS and PNFA was in the visuospatial domain (p < 0.009), being worse in CBS. Using a cutoff of 88/89 out of 100, 90% of CBS and 82.6% of PNFA patients were impaired. At this cutoff of 88/89, ACE-R in CBS had sensitivity and specificity values of 91 and 98%, respectively. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据