4.2 Article

Low Diastolic Pressure and Risk of Dementia in Very Old People: A Longitudinal Study

期刊

DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 213-219

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000236913

关键词

Blood pressure; Dementia; Alzheimer's disease; Longitudinal study

资金

  1. Loo and Hans Ostermans Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research
  4. Gamla Tjanarinnor Foundation
  5. Alzheimer Foundation Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aim: Midlife high blood pressure is linked to late-life dementia. We sought to investigate the temporal relation of blood pressure to the risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease ( AD) among older adults. Methods: A dementia-free cohort (n = 422) aged >= 81 years was followed for 3 years to detect dementia and AD cases ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised criteria). The blood pressure was measured 4 times over a 9-year period starting from >= 75 years of age. The data were analyzed with Cox models controlling for potential confounders. Results: During the 954 person-years of follow-up, 89 subjects developed dementia ( 72 AD cases). Low diastolic pressure (<70 vs. 70-89 mm Hg) was associated with a multiadjusted hazard ratio of 2.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-4.32] for dementia and 2.16 (95% CI = 0.98-4.73) for AD occurring over a 6- to 9-year period, whereas high diastolic pressure (>= 90 mm Hg) was marginally related to a decreased hazard ratio of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.33-1.02) for dementia and 0.57 (95% CI = 0.30-1.09) for AD. Systolic pressure was not significantly related to dementia risk. Subjects who developed dementia had a greater decline in blood pressure than persons who did not, mainly during the 3-year period before dementia diagnosis. Conclusion: Low diastolic pressure predicts the risk of dementia among very old people, and the blood pressure exhibits a substantial decline over around 3 years before the dementia syndrome becomes clinically evident. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据