4.2 Article

Cognitive function and psychiatric symptoms in early- and late-onset frontotemporal dementia

期刊

DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 439-444

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000124751

关键词

cognitive function/psychiatric symptoms frontotemporal dementia; early-onset frontotemporal dementia; Late-onset frontotemporal dementia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aim: Some recent studies mentioned that late-onset frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is more common than previously assumed. Although much research has been done in the field, there are no systematic studies which have compared clinical characteristics of early- and late-onset FTD. The aim of this study was to compare cognitive function and psychiatric symptoms in patients with early- and late-onset FTD. Methods: Study participants were consecutive outpatients. There were 35 FTD patients; their mean age at onset was 63.0 years. We studied sex, education, duration from onset to consultation, Clinical Dementia Rating ( CDR) scores, Mini-Mental State Examination ( MMSE) scores, Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices ( RCPM) scores, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores at first consultation of early- and late-onset FTD patients. Results: There were no significant differences in sex ratio, education, CDR scores, and duration from onset to consultation. There were significant differences in the total MMSEscores,' three- word recall task', 'construction task', and RCPM scores; late-onset groups scored significantly lower than early- onset groups. There were significant differences in the apathy domain of NPI and total NPI scores; late-onset groups scored significantly higher than early- onset groups. Conclusion: Late-onset FTD patients may have memory and visuospatial deficits in addition to their behavioural changes, even if they are clinically diagnosed according to consensus diagnostic criteria. They also present more apathy, and they may have a different histolopathological background. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据