4.4 Article

Dissolved organic carbon export and subsequent remineralization in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic realms of the North Atlantic basin

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.02.013

关键词

DOC; CFC; AOU; Carbon export; NADW

资金

  1. NSF [OCE-0752972, OCE02241614, OCE0648541]
  2. NASA [NNX09AL09G]
  3. [OCE-0223951]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [752972] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. NASA [113709, NNX09AL09G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissolved organic carbon (DOG) data are presented from three meridional transects conducted in the North Atlantic as part of the US Climate Variability (CLIVAR) Repeat Hydrography program in 2003. The hydrographic sections covered a latitudinal range of 6 degrees S to 63 degrees N along longitudes 20 degrees W (CLIVAR line A16), 52 degrees W (A20) and 66 degrees W (A22). Over 3700 individual measurements reveal unprecedented detail in the DOG distribution and systematic variations in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones of the North Atlantic basin. Latitudinal gradients in DOG concentrations combined with published estimates of ventilation rates for the main thermocline and North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) indicate a net DOC export rate of 0.081 Pg C yr(-1) from the epipelagic zone into the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones. Model II regression and multiple linear regression models applied to pairwise measures of DOG and chlorofluorocarbon (CFC-12) ventilation age, retrieved from major water masses within the main thermocline and NADW, indicate decay rates for exported DOG ranging from 0.13 to 0.94 mu mol kg(-1) yr(-1), with higher DOG concentrations driving higher rates. The contribution of DOG oxidation to oxygen consumption ranged from 5 to 29% while mineralization of sinking biogenic particles drove the balance of the apparent oxygen utilization. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据