4.5 Article

Pelagic decapods in the northern Benguela upwelling system: Distribution, ecophysiology and contribution to active carbon flux

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2013.02.003

关键词

Lipid; Fatty acid; Respiration; ETS activity; C/N isotopes; Ingestion

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decapods were sampled with a 1 m(2) MOCNESS (mainly upper 1000 m) in the northern Benguela Current during three cruises in December 2009, September/October 2010 and February 2011. Although pelagic decapods are abundant members of the micronekton community, information about their ecophysiology is very limited. Species-specific regional distribution limits were detected for various decapod species (e.g. Plesionika carinata, Sergestes arcticus, Pasiphaea semispinosa). Significant diel vertical migration patterns were determined for three caridean and three penaeiodean species. Biomass was variable and ranged from 23 to 2770 mg dry mass m(-2) with highest values for P. semispinosa. Fatty acid and stable isotope analyses revealed that the examined decapod species are omnivorous to carnivorous except for the herbivorous to omnivorous species P. carinata. Calanid copepods such as Calanoides carinatus were identified as an important prey item especially for caridean species. Community consumption rates of pelagic decapods derived from respiration rates ranged from 7 mg C m(-2) d(-1) (23 degrees S) to > 20 mg C m(-2) d(-1) (19 degrees S, 17 degrees S). A potential active respiratory carbon flux was calculated for migrating pelagic decapods with 4.4 mg C m(-2) d(-1) for the upper 200 m and with 2.6 mg C m(-2) d(-1) from the base of the euphotic zone to a depth of 600 m. Overall, pelagic decapods apparently play a more prominent role in the northern Benguela Current ecosystem than previously assumed and may exert a substantial predation impact on calanid copepods (up to 13% d(-1) of standing stock). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据