4.5 Article

Estimating the risk of fire outbreaks in the natural environment

期刊

DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 411-442

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10618-011-0213-2

关键词

Fire outbreaks; Fire prediction; Greenhouse emission; Remote sensing; Classification; Rules; Trees; Ensembles

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0103, J2-0734, J2-2285]
  2. European Commission [HEALTH-F4-2008-223451]
  3. Centre of Excellence for Integrated Approaches in Chemistry and Biology of Proteins [OP13.1.1.2.02.005]
  4. Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School
  5. ARVALIS-Institut du vegetal, Pau, France
  6. Jozef Stefan Institute
  7. Ministry of Education, Science and Sports [M1-0032]
  8. Ministry of Defence of Slovenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A constant and controlled level of emission of carbon and other gases into the atmosphere is a pre-condition for preventing global warming and an essential issue for a sustainable world. Fires in the natural environment are phenomena that extensively increase the level of greenhouse emissions and disturb the normal functioning of natural ecosystems. Therefore, estimating the risk of fire outbreaks and fire prevention are the first steps in reducing the damage caused by fire. In this study, we build predictive models to estimate the risk of fire outbreaks in Slovenia, using data from a GIS, Remote Sensing imagery and the weather prediction model ALADIN. The study is carried out on three datasets, from three regions: one for the Kras region, one for the coastal region and one for continental Slovenia. On these datasets, we apply both classical statistical approaches and state-of-the-art data mining algorithms, such as ensembles of decision trees, in order to obtain predictive models of fire outbreaks. In addition, we explore the influence of fire fuel information on the performance of the models, measured in terms of accuracy, Kappa statistic, precision and recall. Best results in terms of predictive accuracy are obtained by ensembles of decision trees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据