4.5 Article

Learning Bayesian networks by hill climbing: efficient methods based on progressive restriction of the neighborhood

期刊

DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY
卷 22, 期 1-2, 页码 106-148

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10618-010-0178-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [TIN2007-67418-C03-01]
  2. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha [PBI-08-048]
  3. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Learning Bayesian networks is known to be an NP-hard problem and that is the reason why the application of a heuristic search has proven advantageous in many domains. This learning approach is computationally efficient and, even though it does not guarantee an optimal result, many previous studies have shown that it obtains very good solutions. Hill climbing algorithms are particularly popular because of their good trade-off between computational demands and the quality of the models learned. In spite of this efficiency, when it comes to dealing with high-dimensional datasets, these algorithms can be improved upon, and this is the goal of this paper. Thus, we present an approach to improve hill climbing algorithms based on dynamically restricting the candidate solutions to be evaluated during the search process. This proposal, dynamic restriction, is new because other studies available in the literature about restricted search in the literature are based on two stages rather than only one as it is presented here. In addition to the aforementioned advantages of hill climbing algorithms, we show that under certain conditions the model they return is a minimal I-map of the joint probability distribution underlying the training data, which is a nice theoretical property with practical implications. In this paper we provided theoretical results that guarantee that, under these same conditions, the proposed algorithms also output a minimal I-map. Furthermore, we experimentally test the proposed algorithms over a set of different domains, some of them quite large (up to 800 variables), in order to study their behavior in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据