4.7 Article

Bis(triphenyl-λ5-phosphanylidene)ammonium fluoride: a reactive fluoride source to access the hypervalent silicates [MenSiF5-n]- (n=0-3)

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 4326-4334

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3dt52617h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new synthesis of bis(triphenyl-lambda(5)-phosphanylidene)ammonium fluoride ((Ph3PNPPh3)F, abbreviated as (PNP)F), is described. The title compound has been fully characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, vibrational spectroscopy, elemental analysis and single crystal and powder X-ray diffraction for the first time. In the solid state (PNP) F exists as a covalent molecular compound, in which the fluoride ion is asymmetrically bonded to the two phosphorus atoms of the [PNP](+) cation. The phosphorus-fluorine bond with 181.98(13) pm is surprisingly long and the longest P-F bond in any phosphorane. (PNP) F can be assumed to be a very good source of reactive fluoride. To investigate the fluoride ion donating properties, (PNP) F was reacted with a range of different fluoromethylsilanes MenSiF4-n (n = 0-4). Reactions of (PNP) F with the fluoromethylsilanes were performed in aceto-or propionitrile and in 1,2-dimethoxy-ethane under inert conditions. The resulting hypervalent fluoromethylsilicates [MenSiF5-n](-) (n = 0-3) were fully characterized by multinuclear NMR and vibrational spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction. From the reaction of (PNP) F with Me4Si in acetonitrile, the starting materials were recovered unchanged. To aid the understanding of the experimental results the fluoride ion affinities (FIA) for these silanes have been calculated by DFT calculations on the PBE0/def2-TZVPP level of theory. The fluoride ion affinity in the series of MenSiF4-n (n = 0-4) decreases with the number of methyl groups and is too low for Me4Si to bind a fluoride ion under these reaction conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据