4.7 Article

Bisphosphonate metal complexes as selective inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi farnesyl diphosphate synthase

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 41, 期 21, 页码 6468-6476

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2dt12179d

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSIC [352]
  2. ANII
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [0521237]
  4. U.S. National Institutes of Health [AI-82542]
  5. RIDIMEDCHAG (CYTED) network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the search for a pharmacological answer to treat Chagas disease, eight metal complexes with two bioactive bisphosphonates, alendronate (Ale) and pamidronate (Pam), were described. Complexes of the formula [M-2(II)(Ale)(4)(H2O)(2)]center dot 2H(2)O, with M = Cu, Co, Mn, Ni, and ([CuPam]center dot H2O)(n) as well as [M-II(Pam)(2)(H2O)(2)]center dot 3H(2)O, with M = Co, Mn and Ni, were synthesized and fully characterized. Crystal structure of [Cu-2(II)(Ale)(4)(H2O)(2)]center dot 2H(2)O, [Co-II(Pam)(2)(H2O)(2)] and [Ni-II(Pam)(2)(H2O)(2)] were solved by X-ray single crystal diffraction methods and the structures of [M-2(II)(Ale)(4)(H2O)(2)]center dot 2H(2)O complexes M = Co, Mn and Ni were studied by X-ray powder diffraction methods. All obtained complexes were active against the amastigote form of Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), etiological agent of Chagas disease. Most of them were more active than the corresponding free ligands showing no toxicity for mammalian cells. The main mechanism of the antiparasitic action of bisphosphonates, inhibition of parasitic farnesyl diphosphate synthase (TcFPPS), remains in the obtained metal complexes and an increase in the inhibiting enzyme levels was observed upon coordination. Observed enzymatic inhibition was selective for TcFPPS as the metal complexes showed no or little inhibition of human FPPS. Additionally, metal complexation might improve the bioavailability of the complexes through the hindrance of the phosphonate group's ionization at physiological pH and, eventually, through the ability of plasma proteins to work as complex transporters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据