4.7 Article

VIVO and CuII complexation by ligands based on pyridine nitrogen donors

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 41, 期 41, 页码 12824-12838

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2dt31109g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT (Ciencia Initiatives) [PTDC/QuiQui/101187/2008, PEst-OE/QUI/UI0100/2011, PEst-OE/QUI/UI0612/2011, PEst-OE/QUI/UI0536/2011, SFRH/BPD79778/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binary and ternary systems formed by (VO)-O-IV and Cu-II ions with ligands (L) based on the pyridine ring (1,10-phenanthroline (phen), 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy), 2,2': 6',2 ''-terpyridine (terpy), 2,2'-bipyrimidine (bpm) and 2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine (bpp)) were studied, combining spectroscopic (EPR and UV-vis), pH-potentiometric and computational (DFT calculations) methods. In the systems with (VO)-O-IV, the formation of mono-chelated complexes with equatorial-equatorial and equatorial-axial (phen, bpy, bpm and bpp) or equatorial-equatorial-equatorial and equatorial-axial-equatorial coordination (terpy) and bis-chelated species with cis-octahedral geometry, with a water or a hydroxido ion in the fourth equatorial position, is demonstrated. Phen, bpy, bpm and bpp form also a dinuclear [(VO)(2)L-2(H2O)(2)(OH)(2)](2+) complex with an anti-coplanar arrangement of the two (VO)-O-IV ions and a ferromagnetic coupling between the metal ions. Due to the low basicity of the nitrogen donors, the potentially tetradentate 2,2'-bipyrimidine and 2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine behave like simple bidentate ligands, and in the ternary systems with 2,2'-bipyridine the expected dinuclear species, in which the former ligands would act as a bridge between the two metal ions using all four nitrogen donors, are not formed. The interaction of phen and Cu-II-phen complexes with human serum albumin (HSA) was also studied at pH 7.4 by circular dichroism and EPR spectroscopy, the formation of several HSA-Cu-II-phen containing species being confirmed and their binding constants determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据