4.7 Article

A facile hydrothermal method to BiSbO4 nanoplates with superior photocatalytic performance for benzene and 4-chlorophenol degradations

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 40, 期 21, 页码 5774-5780

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1dt10130g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20977016]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB613306]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [PC-SIRT0818]
  4. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials [NM10-01]
  5. NSF of Fujian province for Distinguished Young Investigator [2009J06004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BiSbO4 nanoplates with a large BET specific area has been prepared successfully via a facile hydrothermal reaction from Sb2O3 and Bi(NO3)(3). The effects of reaction conditions and the precursors on the final products were investigated. It is proposed that the redox reaction between Sb2O3 and Bi(NO3) (3) plays a pivotal role in the formation of nanocrystalline BiSbO4. The hydrothermally prepared nanocrystalline BiSbO4 was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), N-2-sorption BET surface area, UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The DRS result clarifies that BiSbO4, originally believed to be a visible light responsive photocatalyst, is indeed UV light responsive with a band gap of 3.5 eV. The existence of Bi containing an impurity may be responsible for the visible light response of BiSbO4 prepared via a conventional solid state reaction. BiSbO4 nanoplates prepared via the hydrothermal method showed superior photocatalytic performance for the degradation of benzene and 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) as compared to BiSbO4 prepared via a solid state reaction and Degussa P25. BiSbO4(Hy) nanoplates can be a promising photocatalyst in the treatment of environmental pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据