4.7 Article

Assembly of titanium embedded polyoxometalates with unprecedented structural features

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 39, 期 48, 页码 11599-11604

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0dt01327g

关键词

-

资金

  1. ESPRC
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. WestCHEM
  4. Royal Society of Edinburgh
  5. Marie Curie Actions
  6. University of Glasgow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two titanium embedded polyoxometalates with unprecedented structural features are presented: a monotitanium containing tungstoantimonate Na13H3[TiO(SbW9O33)(2)]center dot 33H(2)O featuring a {Ti=O}(2+) moiety (1) and a hexatitanium containing tungstoarsenate K-6[Ti-4(H2O)(10)(AsTiW8O33)(2)]center dot 30H(2)O containing a {Ti-4(H2O)(10)}(16+) moiety (2). Both compounds have been fully characterised by single crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis, IR and TGA. 1 is constructed from two alpha-B-{(SbW9O33)-W-III} fragments linked by five sodium cations and an unprecedented square pyramidal Ti(O)O-4 group with a terminal Ti O bond, and 2 exhibits a Krebs-type structure composed of two {AsTiW8O33} fragments, where one W(VI) centre has been substituted for a Ti(IV) centre in each, fused together via a belt of four additional Ti(IV) centres. This system represents the tungsten Ti-incorporated polyoxoanion with one of the highest Ti : W ratios so far reported. Additionally, 2 could also be isolated as an n-tetrabutylammonium salt and has been further characterised by electrochemistry and electrospray ionisation (ESI) MS studies. Due to the unique nature of these systems, both have been fully investigated using DFT calculations yielding highly interesting results. Structure 1 has been optimised with five sodium atoms in the belt position, which in addition to reducing the high charge of the cluster influence a stabilisation of the antimony lone pairs. Electrostatic potential calculations highlight the high electronegativity of the terminal oxygen on the titanium centre, enhancing real potentiality as a reactive site for catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据