4.7 Article

Synthesis, structures and magnetic properties of polynuclear mixed-valence (MnMnIII)-Mn-II complexes containing 3-(2-phenol)-5-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazole ligand

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 -, 期 47, 页码 10511-10517

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b904553h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20771063, 20331020]
  2. Spanish Government [CTQ2006/03949]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports the synthesis, crystal structures, and magnetic properties of a series of mixed-valence polynuclear manganese complexes bridged by a dianionic 1,2,4-triazole-based ligand L2- (H2L = 3-(2-phenol)-5-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazole). Complexes 1 to 3 show a similar binuclear structure, with the central core of [(MnMnIII)-Mn-II(L)(2)] and some other small molecules also coordinated to the two Mn centers. The two [(MnMnIII)-Mn-II(L)(2)] subunits can be further connected by different dicarboxylic acids to construct non-charged tetranuclear complexes 4 to 7. In these complexes, each deprotonated dianionic ligand L2- acts as a mu(2)-bridged ligand to coordinate two Mn centers via the 1,2,4-triazole ring. Bond valence sum (BVS) calculations and Mn surrounding bond lengths indicate that the Mn center coordinated to the pyridine N atoms in the +2 oxidation state, while another Mn center coordinated to the phenolic O atoms is in the +3 oxidation state. The Mn-III centre shows Jahn-Teller elongation along one of the axes. Magnetic studies show the presence of ferromagnetic Mn-III-Mn-II coupling in the binuclear (1-3) and tetranuclear (4-7) complexes with the magnetic coupling constant (J) ranging from 0.58 to 1.17 cm(-1), based on the Hamiltonian H = -2JS(1).S2 (S-1 = 5/2 and S-2 = 2). In all cases both z'J' (intermolecular interactions) and D parameter (Zero Field Splitting of the Mn (III) ion) has been introduced to improve the corresponding fit. The relationship of the coupling interaction between the Mn-II/Mn-III and their electronic structures is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据