4.7 Article

H-atom abstraction reaction for organic substrates via mononuclear copper(II)-superoxo species as a model for D beta M and PHM

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 -, 期 1, 页码 164-170

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b712572k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen atom abstraction reactions have been implicated in oxygenation reactions catalyzed by copper monooxygenases such as peptidylglycine alpha-hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM) and dopamine beta-monooxygenase (D beta M). We have investigated mononuclear copper(I) and copper(II) complexes with bis[(6-neopentylamino-2-pyridyl) methyl][(2-pyridyl) methyl] amine (BNPA) as functional models for these enzymes. The reaction of [Cu-II(bnpa)](2+) with H2O2 affords a quasi-stable mononuclear copper(II)-hydroperoxo complex, [Cu-II(bnpa)(OOH)](+) (4) which is stabilized by hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds in the vicinity of the copper(II) ion. On the other hand, the reaction of [Cu-I(bnpa)](+) (1) with O-2 generates a trans-mu-1,2-peroxo dicopper(II) complex [Cu-2(II)(bnpa)(2)(O-2(2-))](2+) (2). Interestingly, the same reactions carried out in the presence of exogenous substrates such as TEMPO-H, produce a mononuclear copper(II)-hydroperoxo complex 4. Under these conditions, the H-atom abstraction reaction proceeds via the mononuclear copper(II)-superoxo intermediate [Cu-II(bnpa)(O-2(-))](+) (3), as con. rmed from indirect observations using a spin trap reagent. Reactions with several substrates having different bond dissociation energies (BDE) indicate that, under our experimental conditions the H-atom abstraction reaction proceeds for substrates with a weak X-H bond (BDE < 72.6 kcal mol(-1)). These investigations indicate that the copper(II)-hydroperoxo complex is a useful tool for elucidation of H-atom abstraction reaction mechanisms for exogenous substrates. The useful functionality of the complex has been achieved via careful control of experimental conditions and the choice of appropriate ligands for the complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据