4.5 Article

Flt3 ligand synergizes with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in bone marrow mobilization to improve functional outcome after spinal cord injury in the rat

期刊

CYTOTHERAPY
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 1090-1104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14653249.2011.575355

关键词

axonal sprouting; bone marrow mobilization; Flt3 ligand; granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor; neuroprotection; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. [GAAV IAA500390902]
  2. [LC554]
  3. [1M0538]
  4. [AVOZ 503905703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background aims. The effect of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or the cytokine fms-like thyrosin kinase 3 (Flt3) ligand on functional outcome and tissue regeneration was studied in a rat model of spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods. Rats with a balloon-induced compression lesion were injected with G-CSF and/or Flt3 ligand to mobilize bone marrow cells. Behavioral tests (Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan and plantar test), blood counts, morphometric evaluation of the white and gray matter, and histology were performed 5 weeks after SCI. Results. The mobilization of bone marrow cells by G-CSF, Flt3 ligand and their combination improved the motor and sensory performance of rats with SCI, reduced glial scarring, increased axonal sprouting and spared white and gray matter in the lesion. The best results were obtained with a combination of G-CSF and Flt3. G-CSF alone or in combination with Flt3 ligand significantly increased the number of white blood cells, but not red blood cells or hemoglobin content, during and after the time-course of bone marrow stimulation. The combination of factors led to infiltration of the lesion by CD11b(+) cells. Conclusions. The observed improvement in behavioral and morphologic parameters and tissue regeneration in animals with SCI treated with a combination of both factors could be associated with a prolonged time-course of mobilization of bone marrow cells. The intravenous administration of G-CSF and/or Flt3 ligand represents a safe and effective treatment modality for SCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据