4.5 Article

Establishment of immortalized mesenchymal stromal cells with red fluorescence protein expression for in vivo transplantation and tracing in the rat model with traumatic brain injury

期刊

CYTOTHERAPY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 455-465

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14653240903555827

关键词

mesenchymal stromal cells; non-viral transfection; red fluorescent protein; telomerase reverse transcriptase; traumatic brain injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background aims. Human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSC) play a crucial role in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, and have important clinical potential for cell therapy. However, many hMSC studies have been restricted by limited cell numbers and difficult detection in vivo. To expand the lifespan, hMSC are usually immortalized by virus-mediated gene transfer. However, these genetically modified cells easily lose critical phenotypes and stable genotypes because of insertional mutagenesis. Methods. We used a non-viral transfection method to establish human telomerase reverse transcriptase-immortalized cord blood hMSC (hTERT-cbMSC). We also established red fluorescent protein (RFP)-expressing hTERT-cbMSC (hTERT/RFP-cbMSC) by the same non-viral transfection method, and these cells were injected into a rat model with traumatic brain injury for in vivo detection analysis. Results. The hTERT-cbMSC could grow more than 200 population doublings with a stable doubling time and maintained differentiation capacities. hTERT/RFP-cbMSC could proliferate efficiently within 2 weeks at the injury location and could be detected easily under a fluorescent microscope. Importantly, both hTERT-cbMSC and hTERT/RFP-cbMSC showed no chromosomal abnormalities by karyotype analysis and no tumor formation in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice by transplantation assay. Conclusions. We have developed immortalized cbMSC with hTERT expression and RFP expression, which will be useful tools for stem cell research and translational study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据