4.5 Article

Microencapsulated UCB cells repair hepatic injure by intraperitoneal transplantation

期刊

CYTOTHERAPY
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 1032-1040

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14653240903121278

关键词

Differentiate; hepatic injury; hepatotyte; microencapsulation; repair; umbilical cord blood cells

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2005CB522702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [200736006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background aims Umbilical cord blood (UCB) cells are an attractive choice in cytotherapy and represent an alternative to hepatocytes. The aim of this study Was to investigate the feasibility of using the technique of micro-encapsulation to study the differentiation and function of UCB cells in an injured liver model and the potential of encapsulated UCB cells for use in the reversal of hepatic firmly. Methods UCB cells were isolated from fresh human UCB, encapsulated using the alginate-poly-lysine-alginate method and transplanted intraperitoneally into liver-injured mice induced by CCl4. Encapsulated UCB all growth, viability and differentiation in vivo Were detected. For evaluating the recovery of injured liver tissues, serum aminotransferases and liver histology were assessed. Results Encapsulated UCB cells showed better growth behavior after being implanted, tinder conditions favoring differentiation in vivo, the expression of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and albumin (ALB) and urea synthesis were detected in a time-dependent Manner Serum amino-transferases rases were decreased after transplantation of encapsulated UCB cells into injured mice, and damage to the histologic structure of liver was reduced. Conclusions The cell microencapsulation system provides a novel approach for learning more about the differentiation and function of UCB cells in vivo. Transplantation of encapsulated UCB cells can enhance recover), of CCl4-injured mouse liver These observations suggest potential as an alternative to hepatocyte transplantation for cellular therapy of liver failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据