4.5 Article

Dynamic distribution of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and change of pathology after infusing into mdx mice

期刊

CYTOTHERAPY
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 254-264

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14653240802020381

关键词

centrally nucleated fiber; creatine kinase; distribution; dystrophin; mdx mice; mesenchymal stromal cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are attractive candidates for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) but how the donor MSC distribute in multiple organs and whether the increased dystrophin leads to a change in the pathology of mdx mice is still uncertain. In this research we detected the distribution of MSC and the pathology of mdx mice after MSC infusion. Methods MSC were isolated from rat bone marrow (BM) and expanded in proliferation medium. MSC of the fifth passage were delivered intravenously into irradiated mdx mice. The distribution of MSC labeled by [H-3]TdR into a recipient olgans was calculated by radioactivity. The expression of dystrophin was detected at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 after MSC transplantation by immunofluorescence staining, RT-PCR and Western blot. Serum creatine kinase (CK) and centrally nucleated fiber (CNF) were also detected to assess the change in pathology. Results 24-48 h after transplantation, MSC were mainly found in the BM, liver and lung. The radioactivity in these organs decreased, whereas skeletal and myocardial muscle radioactivity increased gradually over time. In accordance with the increased radioactivity in skeletal muscle, the amount of dystrophin-positive myofibers increased. Furthermore serum CK and CAT decreased slightly, suggesting specific pathophysiologic features of the dystrophic muscle were partially restored. Discussion Upon certification of the distribution of transplanted MSC in irradiated mdx mice, we found evidence of myogenic differentiation of MSC in skeletal muscle. This research may help us understand the mechanism of therapy of MSC transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据