4.1 Article

Proanthocyanidin as a cytogenetic protective agent against adverse effects of plant growth regulators supplementation in rats

期刊

CYTOTECHNOLOGY
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 585-596

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10616-013-9607-x

关键词

Plant growth regulators; Gibberellic acid; Indoleacetic acid; Proanthocyanidin

资金

  1. Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to investigate the protective role of grape seed extract (containing proanthocyandin) against the adverse effects of plant growth regulators (GA(3) (gibberellic acid) and IAA (indoleacetic acid)). The present data showed that the administration of either GA(3) and IAA caused undesirable changes in both hepatic and testicular structure. This was evidenced by a disturbed hepatic strands, pyknotic nuclei, central vein with collapsed endothelium, dilatation in bile sinusoids, congested blood vessel, binucleatd hepatocytes, lymphocytic infiltration, vacuolation, giant hepatic cells, increased Kupffer cells and karyoryxis. Additionally, it was shown that degenerative changes in the testis, spermatogenic arrest, moderate tubular necrosis, Leydig cell degeneration and reduction in the number and size of the seminiferous tubules with some spermatogonia detached from the basement membrane. Concerning flow cytometric study of the liver a significant decrease in G0/1 % and a significant increase in S phase %, G2/M %, P-53 % and apoptosis % (sub G1) were detected. However, in testis the data recorded a significant decrease in the percentage of mature sperm (percentage of haploid cells) and a significant increase in the percentage of spermatide, diploid cells, P-53 and of apoptotic cells. On the other hand, a distinct recovery of the mentioned hepatic and testicular histopathological and cytogenetic disorders was observed when proanthocyanidin was supplemented to rats administered either of the plant growth hormones (GA(3) and IAA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据