4.1 Article

Subunit Interactions Within the Chlamydomonas Flagellar Spokehead

期刊

CYTOSKELETON
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 237-246

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cm.20507

关键词

cilia and flagella; radial spokes; pulldown assays; chemical crosslink; protein electroporation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Japan Society for Promotion of Sciences
  3. National Institutes of Health [GM14642]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23570189] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The radial spoke (RS)/central pair (CP) system in cilia and flagella plays an essential role in the regulation of force generation by dynein, the motor protein that drives cilia/flagella movements. Mechanical and mechanochemicl interactions between the CP and the distal part of the RS, the spokehead, should be crucial for this control; however, the details of interaction are totally unknown. As an initial step toward an understanding of the RS-CP interaction, we examined the protein-protein interactions between the five spokehead proteins (radial spoke protein (RSP) 1, RSP4, RSP6, RSP9, and RSP10) and three spoke stalk proteins (RSP2, RSP5, and RSP23), all expressed as recombinant proteins. Three of them were shown to have physiological activities by electroporation-mediated protein delivery into mutants deficient in the respective proteins. Glutathione S-transferase pulldown assays in vitro detected interactions in 10 out of 64 pairs of recombinants. In addition, chemical crosslinking of axonemes using five reagents detected seven kinds of interactions between the RS subunits in situ. Finally, in the mixture of the recombinant spokehead subunits, RSP1, RSP4, RSP6, and RSP9 formed a 7-10S complex as detected by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. It may represent a partial assembly of the spokehead. From these results, we propose a model of interactions taking place between the spokehead subunits. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据