4.2 Article

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Peripheral Blood Dendritic Cells in Patients with Severe Sepsis

期刊

CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY
卷 80B, 期 1, 页码 14-21

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20540

关键词

sepsis; dendritic cells; flow cytometry

资金

  1. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Dendritic cells (DC) play a key role in cell-mediated immunity. We aimed to analyse the number and function of peripheral blood (PB) myeloid and plasmacytoid DC (mDC/pDC) in patients with severe sepsis. Methods: Twenty-six septic patients, 20 surgical patients (abdominal aortic aneurysm) and 20 healthy controls were enrolled in this prospective study. Results: At day 1 (enrollment in the study), septic patients showed in comparison with healthy controls, decreased mDC (P < 0.001) and increased pDC (P = 0.03), resulting in a reduction of the mDC/pDC ratio (P < 0.001). Surgery induced a decrease in both mDCs and pDCs level, without modification of mDC/pDC ratio. Septic patients included 15 survivors and 11 nonsurvivors. At day 1 no significant difference was found in mDC between the two groups, while pDCs were significantly higher in nonsurvivors (P 5 0.03). At the outcome, mDC were selectively increased with respect to day 1 in survivors (P 5 0.001), while no significant differences were observed as far as pDC count is concerned in both groups. Sorted DC from septic patients showed in comparison with healthy controls, reduced levels of HLA DR (P < 0.001), CD11c (P < 0.001), CD83 (P = 0.006) and of costimulatory molecule CD86 (P = 0.003); an up-regulation of chemokine receptor CXCR4 (P = 0.031) and increased apoptosis (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Sepsis has a profound effect on PB DC compartment. These alterations appear to be sepsis-specific. Increased apoptosis and alteration of migration and trafficking mechanism may be involved in DC compartment modification. DC alterations could contribute to sepsis-mediated immunoparalysis. (C) 2010 International Clinical Cytometry Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据