4.3 Review

Functions of Neurotrophins and Growth Factors in Neurogenesis and Brain Repair

期刊

CYTOMETRY PART A
卷 83A, 期 1, 页码 76-89

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22161

关键词

neural stem cells; neurotrophins; growth factors; neurogenesis; brain repair

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FA-PESP) [2006/61285-9]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Provost's Office for Research of the University of Sao Paulo (Programa de incentivoa Pesquisa), Brazil
  4. NAPNA-USP [2011.1.9333.1.3]
  5. CNPq
  6. FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification and isolation of multipotent neural stem and progenitor cells in the brain, giving rise to neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes initiated many studies in order to understand basic mechanisms of endogenous neurogenesis and repair mechanisms of the nervous system and to develop novel therapeutic strategies for cellular regeneration therapies in brain disease. A previous review (Trujillo et al., Cytometry A 2009;75:38-53) focused on the importance of extrinsic factors, especially neurotransmitters, for directing migration and neurogenesis in the developing and adult brain. Here, we extend our review discussing the effects of the principal growth and neurotrophic factors as well as their intracellular signal transduction on neurogenesis, fate determination and neuroprotective mechanisms. Many of these mechanisms have been elucidated by in vitro studies for which neural stem cells were isolated, grown as neurospheres, induced to neural differentiation under desired experimental conditions, and analyzed for embryonic, progenitor, and neural marker expression by flow and imaging cytometry techniques. The better understanding of neural stem cells proliferation and differentiation is crucial for any therapeutic intervention aiming at neural stem cell transplantation and recruitment of endogenous repair mechanisms. (C) 2012 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据