4.5 Article

The-1082A/G polymorphism in the Interleukin-10 gene and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 351-355

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.05.022

关键词

Interleukin-10; Polymorphism; Rheumatoid arthritis; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2008ZX10003-003]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (853) [2007AA022008]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Major Project [2009C13038]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071426, 30871362]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Pvovince, China [D2080910, Y2081072]
  6. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health talents
  7. Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large number of studies have shown that the -1082A/G polymorphism (rs1800896) in the Interleukin-10 gene (IL-10) is implicated in the susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the results are inconsistent and inconclusive. The aim of this study is to analyze the association between the -1082A/G polymorphism in the IL-10 gene and the RA risk by meta-analysis. A total of 1480 cases and 1413 controls in 10 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that the G allele carriers (GG + GA) had a 25% decreased risk of RA, when compared with the homozygote M (odds ratio (OR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.93). In the analysis in Europeans, significant decreased risks were associated with the G allele carriers (OR = 0.73 and 95% CI: 0.57-0.93 for GG + GA vs. AA). The results from this meta-analysis provide evidence for the association between the IL-10 -1082A/G polymorphism and the risk of RA. To further evaluate gene x gene and gene x environment interactions between the polymorphisms in the IL-10 gene and RA risk, more studies with large groups of patients are required. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据