4.5 Article

IL-10 promotes resistance to apoptosis and metastatic potential in lung tumor cell lines

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 294-302

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.11.015

关键词

Interleukin-10; Non-small cell lung carcinoma; Apoptosis; Metastasis; Cancer

资金

  1. Kentucky Lung Cancer Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains at a disappointingly low success rate. Not only is metastatic spread common in NSCLC, but therapeutic success decreases dramatically once metastases are present. Understanding factors which contribute to poor prognosis in NSCLC is critical for development of more successful therapeutic approaches. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) expression has been shown in several studies to correlate with a poorer prognosis in NSCLC; however, the mechanisms by which IL-10 affects lung tumor growth and metastases are unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of tumor-derived IL-10 on the growth and metastasis of lung cancer cells in a murine model. Lewis lung carcinoma cells were stably transfected with the chicken ovalbumin gene (cOVA) as a model tumor antigen (LL43 tumor cells) and subsequently transfected with the murine IL-10 gene (LL43-10 tumor cells). Subcutaneous growth of the LL43 tumor cells was not affected by expression of IL-10. However, LL43-10 tumors had a fourfold increase in tumor microvessel density, as indicated by CD31 staining. Metastatic potential was also increased in IL-10-expressing lung tumor cells, leading to a greater number of tumor cells in lymph nodes draining the primary tumor site. Finally, exposure of Lewis lung tumor cells in vitro to exogenous IL-10 dramatically increased their resistance to UV-induced apoptosis. These results indicate that a primary effect of IL-10 on lung cancer cells may be to increase their metastatic potential by promoting angiogenesis and resistance to apoptosis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据