4.4 Article

Bentonite dispersions: Transition from liquid-like to solid-like behavior and cracking

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID MECHANICS
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 50-64

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.03.001

关键词

Bentonite; Cracking; Yield stress; Bending; Buckling; Compression

资金

  1. US Gypsum Corporation (USG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cylindrical samples of 11-13 wt% aqueous bentonite dispersions with a range of resting times after preparation (0-72 h) were subject to axial squeezing and revealed a transition from a Bingham liquid-like behavior to solid-like behavior. The liquid-like behavior is characterized by viscous spreading arrested by the yield stress, whereas the solid-like behavior is characterized by stasis at lower loads followed by discontinuity of the displacement and cracking above some critical level of load. A mechanical response, dependent on resting time, implied irreversible aging as a result of slow swelling of the clay crystallites, i.e. the internal structure being built over time in the material at rest. Dispersions of 11 wt% and 12 wt% transitioned from liquid-like to solid-like behavior in a single experiment at a resting time of 24 h and 3 h, respectively. At higher concentrations (18-22 wt%) the material always behaves as a solid. The solid-like behavior is distinguished from the liquid-like behavior by the appearance of cracks. The additional bending and buckling experiments conducted with dispersions of 18-22 wt% revealed Young's moduli of 330-500 kPa, yield stresses of 9-15 kPa, cracking stresses of 15-25 kPa, and cracking strains of 8-10%. For all concentrations explored, a linear dependence of the yield stress on concentration was found. It is demonstrated for the first time using uniaxial compression that liquid bentonite dispersions at a concentration of 11-12 wt% reveal transition to a solid in a single experiment where they become capable of developing surfaces of discontinuity of the displacement. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据