4.1 Article

Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) Mechanism in Chicken

期刊

CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH
卷 135, 期 1, 页码 65-78

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000330125

关键词

Alternative lengthening of telomeres; Chicken; DF-1; DT40; Immortalization; OU2; Promyelocytic leukemia; Recombination; Telomerase; Telomere

资金

  1. National Research Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [2005-35205-16679]
  2. USDA-NIFA [NE-1016 (CA-D*-ASC-7281-RR), NRSP-8 (CA-D*-ASC-7233-RR)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telomere maintenance is an important genetic mechanism controlling cellular proliferation. Normally, telomeres are maintained by telomerase which is downregulated upon cellular differentiation in most somatic cell lineages. Telomerase activity is upregulated in immortalized cells and cancers to support an infinite lifespan and uncontrolled cell growth; however, some immortalized and transformed cells lack telomerase activity. Telomerase-negative tumors and immortalized cells utilize an alternative mechanism for maintaining telomeres termed alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). This research explored evidence for the ALT pathway in chicken cell lines by studying nontransformed immortalized cell lines (DF-1 and OU2) and comparing them to a normal (mortal) cell line and a transformed cell line (DT40). The research consisted of molecular and cellular analyses including profiling of telomeric DNA (array sizing and total content), telomerase activity, and expression of genes involved in the telomerase, recombination, and ALT pathways. In addition, an immunofluorescence analysis for an ALT marker, i.e. ALT-associated promyelocytic leukemia bodies (APBs), was conducted. Evidence for ALT was observed in the telomerase-negative immortalized cell lines. Additionally, the APB marker was also found in the other cell systems. The attributes of the chicken provide an additional vertebrate model for investigation of the ALT pathway. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据