4.5 Article

Alteration of Resting-State Brain Sensorimotor Connectivity following Spinal Cord Injury: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 32, 期 18, 页码 1422-1427

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3661

关键词

cortical reorganization; brain plasticity; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. Biomedical Research Institute grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motor and sensory deficits after spinal cord injury (SCI) result in functional reorganization of the sensorimotor network. While several task-evoked functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies demonstrated functional alteration of the sensorimotor network in SCI, there has been no study of the possible alteration of resting-state functional connectivity using resting-state fMRI. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes of brain functional connectivity in the sensorimotor cortex of patients with SCI. We evaluated the functional connectivity scores between brain areas within the sensorimotor network in 18 patients with SCI and 18 controls. Our findings demonstrated that, compared with control subjects, patients with SCI showed increased functional connectivity between primary motor cortex and other motor areas, such as the supplementary motor area and basal ganglia. However, decreased functional connectivity between primary somatosensory cortex and secondary somatosensory cortex also was found in patients with SCI, compared with controls. These findings therefore demonstrated alteration of the resting-state sensorimotor network in patients with SCI, who showed increased connectivity between motor components, and decreased connectivity between sensory components, within the sensorimotor network, suggesting that motor components within the motor network increased in functional connectivity in order to compensate for motor deficits, whereas the sensory network did not show any such increases or compensation for sensory deficits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据