4.5 Article

Targeting Mitochondrial Biogenesis to Treat Insulin Resistance

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 20, 期 35, 页码 5527-5557

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612820666140306102514

关键词

Type 2 diabetes; mitochondrial dysfunction; calorie restriction; exercise; AMPK; SIRT1; PGC-1

资金

  1. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [082610]
  2. MINECO [SAF2011-23886]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the last century, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes has dramatically increased, reaching the status of epidemic. Because insulin resistance is considered the primary cause of type 2 diabetes, the identification of the cellular processes and gene networks that lead to an impairment of insulin action in target tissues is of crucial importance for the development of new drugs and therapeutic strategies to treat or prevent the disease. Numerous studies in humans and animal models have shown that insulin resistance is frequently associated to reduced mitochondrial mass or oxidative function in insulin sensitive tissues, leading to the hypothesis that defective overall mitochondrial activity could play a relevant role in the etiology of insulin resistance and, therefore, in type 2 diabetes. Although the causal relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and insulin resistance is still controversial, numerous studies show that lifestyle or pharmacological interventions that improve insulin sensitivity are frequently associated to an increase in mitochondrial function and whole body energy expenditure. Therefore, increasing mitochondrial mass and oxidative activity is viewed as a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of insulin resistance. Here, we review the current knowledge on the role of mitochondria in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and discuss some of the potential therapeutic strategies and pharmacological targets for the treatment of insulin resistance based on the activation of mitochondrial biogenesis and the increase of mitochondrial oxidative function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据