4.5 Article

Metabolic Engineering of Plant Secondary Products: Which Way Forward?

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 19, 期 31, 页码 5622-5639

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612811319310016

关键词

Metabolic engineering; secondary metabolites; plant cell culture; microbes; transgenic plants; post-genomics technologies

资金

  1. MICINN, Spain [BFU2007-61413, BIO2011-23324, BIO02011-22525, PIM2010PKB-00746]
  2. European Union Framework 7 Program-SmartCell Integrated Project [222716]
  3. European Union Framework 7 European Research Council IDEAS Advanced Grant
  4. COST Action [FA0804, FA1006]
  5. MICINN, Spain
  6. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary products are small molecular weight compounds produced by secondary metabolic pathways in plants. They are regarded as non-essential for normal growth and development but often confer benefits such as defense against pathogens, pests and herbivores or the attraction of pollinators. Many secondary products affect the survival and/or behavior of microbes, insects and mammals and they often have useful pharmacological effects in humans. Most secondary products can only be obtained as extracts from medicinal plants, many of which grow slowly and are difficult to cultivate. Chemical synthesis, although possible in principle, is often impractical or uneconomical due to the complexity of their molecular structures. The large scale production of secondary products by metabolic engineering has therefore been investigated in a number of heterologous systems including microbes, plant cell/organ cultures, and intact plants. In this critical review of production platforms for plant secondary products, we discuss the advantages and constraints of different approaches and the impact of post- genomics technologies on gene discovery and metabolite analysis. We highlight bottlenecks that remain to be overcome before the routine exploitation of secondary products can be achieved for the benefit of mankind.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据