4.5 Article

Recent Developments of DNA Poisons - Human DNA Topoisomerase IIα Inhibitors - as Anticancer Agents

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 19, 期 13, 页码 2474-2488

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612811319130016

关键词

DNA topoisomerase II alpha; DNA poisons; intercalators; non-intercalators; redox-dependent poisons; inhibitors; anticancer agents; medicinal chemistry; drug design

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia [P1-0012, 1000-10-310260, Z1-4111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA topoisomerases are an important family of enzymes that catalyze the induction of topological changes in the DNA molecule. Their ability to modulate the topology of the DNA makes DNA topoisomerases a key player in several vital cell processes such as replication, transcription, chromosome separation and segregation. Consequently, they already represent an important collection of macromolecular targets for some of the established anticancer drugs on the market as well as serve as templates in the development of novel anticancer drugs especially supported by recent structural advances in the field. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the recent developments in the field of DNA poisons - a major class of human topoisomerase II alpha inhibitors - of which several are already in clinical use. Due to frequently experienced occurrence of serious side effects of these molecules during therapy, especially cardiotoxicity issues, further drug design efforts were initiated already yielding novel promising compounds that have overcome this issue and already entered into clinical studies. Some of the presented and discussed chemical classes include intercalators, non-intercalators and redox-dependent poisons of human topoisomerase II alpha. In particular, this review focuses on the currently available structure-based standpoint of molecular design and on the medicinal chemist's perspective of this field of anticancer drug design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据