4.5 Review

Treating the Cognitive Deficits of Schizophrenia with Alpha4Beta2 Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor Agonists

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 309-322

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138161210790170166

关键词

Learning; memory; attention; pre-attention; sensory gating; behavior; evoked potential; electroencephalogram; EEG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenic patients exhibit debilitating impairments of intellectual function. Typical and atypical antipsychotic medications are largely ineffective at treating the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia (CDS), and efforts to discover compounds that treat these symptoms are ongoing. Considerable tobacco use in schizophrenic patients, genetic linkage, and receptor binding studies suggest the involvement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in schizophrenia. Neuronal alpha 4 beta 2 nAChRs are widely distributed in the mammalian brain, and are implicated in normal cognitive functioning in animal models. Ligands of various selectivity and potency have been used to study the role of the alpha 4 beta 2 subtype in schizophrenia. For instance, studies in rodents show that alpha 4 beta 2 agonists improve sensory gating, an information processing function that is deficient in schizophrenia. Pharmacological studies in animals also suggest that alpha 4 beta 2 nAChRs are involved in other cognitive domains that are impaired in schizophrenia, including speed of processing, working memory, visual learning and memory, and social cognition. The non-selective nAChR agonist nicotine has been shown to improve CDS in several human clinical studies, and recent trials have been undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of more alpha 4 beta 2 selective compounds. It remains to be determined whether alpha 4 beta 2 agonists will provide greater efficacy than nicotine for CDS or reducing tobacco use in patients. Pre-clinical evidence to date suggests that agonists of the nicotinic alpha 4 beta 2 subtype could be useful in improving cognitive function in schizophrenic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据