4.3 Article

Synthesis of Biologically Active Catecholic Compounds via ortho-Selective Oxygenation of Phenolic Compounds Using Hypervalent Iodine(V) Reagents

期刊

CURRENT ORGANIC SYNTHESIS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 650-669

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/157017912803251792

关键词

Ortho-hydroxylation; Ortho-quinones; catechols; hypervalent iodine(V) reagents; Iodylarenes; 2-Iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX); stabilized 2-Iodoxybenzoic acid (SIBX); polymer-supported IBX

资金

  1. Simafex company
  2. Association Nationale de la Recherche Technique
  3. Institut Universitaire de France
  4. Ministere de la Recherche
  5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  6. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR), the Universita degli Studi della Tuscia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catecholic motifs are present in numerous natural products and synthetic compounds used in various sectors of the chemical industries such as food, cosmetic, pharmaceutical and polymer industries. The antioxidant activity usually conferred to compounds bearing catecholic motifs is the property on which their application is often based. Although several (bio) chemical methods are available to chemists to produce catechols, the oxygenation of phenols constitutes one of the most practical approaches as long as the ortho-selectivity of the process can be controlled. In this context, oxygenating hypervalent iodine(V) reagents offer a convenient metal-free solution. Among these reagents, 2-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX) or its stabilized (non explosive) SIBX and polymer-supported versions have found the most useful and successful applications in the conversion of phenols into ortho-quinones, followed by reduction into catechols. Examples of oxygenative demethylation of 2-methoxyphenols and ortho-hydroxylation of phenolic compounds for the synthesis of biologically and industrially-relevant catechols are highlighted in this review article, together with some mechanistic discussions on these transformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据