4.5 Article

Computational evaluation of protein-small molecule binding

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 56-61

出版社

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.11.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA120215, CA120215, CA107331, R01 CA107331, F32CA1197712] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL082670, R21 HL082670] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM070855, R01 GM072558, R29 GM051501, R01 GM051501-12, R01 GM051501, R01 GM070855-04, R01 GM072558-05, GM51501] Funding Source: Medline
  4. CDMRP [542406, CA120215] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determining protein-small molecule binding affinity is a key component of present-day rational drug discovery. To circumvent the time, labor, and materials costs associated with experimental protein-small molecule binding assays, a variety of structure-based computational methods have been developed for determining protein-small molecule binding affinities. These methods can be placed in one of two classes: accurate but slow (Class 1), and fast but approximate (Class 2). Class 1 methods, which explicitly take into account protein flexibility and include an atomic-level description of solvation, are capable of quantitatively reproducing experimental protein-small molecule absolute binding free energies. However, Class 1 computational requirements make screening thousands to millions of small molecules against a protein, as required for rational drug design, infeasible for the foreseeable future. Class 2 methods, on the contrary, are sufficiently fast to perform such inhibitor screening, yet they suffer from limited descriptions of protein flexibility and solvation, which in turn limit their ability to select and rank-order small molecules by computed binding affinities. This review presents an overview of Class 1 and Class 2 methods, and avenues of research in Class 2 methods aimed at bringing them closer to Class 1 accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据