4.6 Article

Continuous intraputamenal convection-enhanced delivery in adult rhesus macaques

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 1569-1577

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS132345

关键词

Parkinson disease; convection-enhanced delivery; rhesus macaques; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECT Assessing the safety and feasibility of chronic delivery of compounds to the brain using convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is important for the further development of this important therapeutic technology. The objective of this study was to follow and model the distribution of a compound delivered by CED into the putamen of rhesus monkeys. METHODS The authors sequentially implanted catheters into 4 sites spanning the left and right putamen in each of 6 rhesus monkeys. The catheters were connected to implanted pumps, which were programmed to deliver a 5-mM solution of the MRI contrast agent Gd-DTPA at 0.1 mu l/minute for 7 days and 0.3 mu l/minute for an additional 7 days. The animals were followed for 28 days per implant cycle during which they were periodically examined with MRI. RESULTS All animals survived the 4 surgeries with no deficits in behavior. Compared with acute infusion, the volume of distribution (V-d) increased 2-fold with 7 days of chronic infusion. Increasing the flow rate 3-fold over the next week increased the V-d an additional 3-fold. Following withdrawal of the compound, the half-life of Gd-DTPA in the brain was estimated as 3.1 days based on first-order pharmacokinetics. Histological assessment of the brain showed minimal tissue damage limited to the insertion site. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate several important features in the development of a chronically implanted pump and catheter system: 1) the ability to place catheters accurately in a predetermined target; 2) the ability to deliver compounds in a chronic fashion to the putamen; and 3) the use of MRI and MR visible tracers to follow the evolution of the infusion volume over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据