4.4 Review

ICT and autism care: state of the art

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 474-483

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000455

关键词

autism spectrum disorder; information and communication technologies; serious games; social robots; social skills

资金

  1. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-CORD-0004]
  2. European Commission (FP7: MICHELANGELO) [288241]
  3. endowment fund 'Entreprendre pour aider'
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-CORD-0004] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Over the past 10 years, the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has increased in regard to the treatment of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). ICT support mechanisms (e.g. computers, laptops, robots) are particularly attractive and are adapted to children with ASD. In addition, ICT algorithms can offer new perspectives for clinicians, outside direct apps or gaming proposals. Here, we will focus on the use of serious games and robots because of their attractiveness and their value in working on social skills. Recent findings The latest knowledge regarding the use of ICT in the forms of serious games and robotics applied to individuals with ASD shows that the field of serious games has already achieved interesting and promising results, although the clinical validations are not always complete. In the field of robotics, there are still many limitations on the use of ICT (e.g. most interaction are similar to the wizard of Oz), and questions remain concerning their eventual effectiveness. To describe the implications of the findings for clinical practice or research, we describe two large projects, namely, JEMImE and Michelangelo, as examples of current studies that are aimed at enhancing social skills in children with ASD by including novel algorithms with clinical insights in robots or serious games.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据