4.4 Review

How successful are first episode programs? A review of the evidence for specialized assertive early intervention

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 167-172

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000052

关键词

Assertive Community Treatment model; early intervention; first episode psychosis; randomized clinical trial; schizophrenia

资金

  1. Danish Ministry of Health [96-0770-71]
  2. Danish Ministry of Social Affairs
  3. University of Copenhagen
  4. Copenhagen Hospital Cooperation
  5. Danish Medical Research Council [9601612, 9900734]
  6. LundbeckFoundation
  7. TrygFoundation
  8. Capital Region of Denmark
  9. Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark
  10. Slagtermester Worzners Foundation
  11. Stanley Wada Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewIt has been hypothesized that the first 5 years after first episode of psychosis are a critical period with opportunities for ameliorating the course of illness. On the basis of this rationale, specialized assertive early intervention services were developed. We wanted to investigate the evidence basis for such interventions.Recent findingsThe evidence for the effectiveness of specialized assertive early intervention services is mainly based on one large randomized clinical trial, the OPUS trial, but it is supported by the findings in smaller trials, such as the Lambeth Early Onset trial, the Croydon Outreach and Assertive Support Team trial and the Norwegian site of Optimal Treatment trial. There are positive effects on psychotic and negative symptoms, on substance abuse and user satisfaction, but the clinical effects are not sustainable when patients are transferred to standard treatment. However, the positive effects on service use and ability to live independently seem to be durable.SummaryImplementation of specialized assertive early intervention services is recommended, but the evidence basis needs to be strengthened through replication in large high-quality trials. Recommendation regarding the duration of treatment must await results of ongoing trials comparing 2 years of intervention with extended treatment periods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据