4.5 Article

Childhood Cumulative Risk Exposure and Adult Amygdala Volume and Function

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 94, 期 6, 页码 535-543

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23681

关键词

children; cumulative risk; amygdala volume; amygdala function

资金

  1. NCMHD [RC2MD004767]
  2. W.T. Grant Foundation
  3. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health
  4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U49/CE002099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considerable work indicates that early cumulative risk exposure is aversive to human development, but very little research has examined the neurological underpinnings of these robust findings. This study investigates amygdala volume and reactivity to facial stimuli among adults (mean 23.7 years of age, n=54) as a function of cumulative risk exposure during childhood (9 and 13 years of age). In addition, we test to determine whether expected cumulative risk elevations in amygdala volume would mediate functional reactivity of the amygdala during socioemotional processing. Risks included substandard housing quality, noise, crowding, family turmoil, child separation from family, and violence. Total and left hemisphere adult amygdala volumes were positively related to cumulative risk exposure during childhood. The links between childhood cumulative risk exposure and elevated amygdala responses to emotionally neutral facial stimuli in adulthood were mediated by the corresponding amygdala volumes. Cumulative risk exposure in later adolescence (17 years of age), however, was unrelated to subsequent adult amygdala volume or function. Physical and socioemotional risk exposures early in life appear to alter amygdala development, rendering adults more reactive to ambiguous stimuli such as neutral faces. These stress-related differences in childhood amygdala development might contribute to the well-documented psychological distress as a function of early risk exposure. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据