4.4 Article

Mania and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: common symptomatology, common pathophysiology and common treatment?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 1-7

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328331f694

关键词

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; bipolar disorder; compensatory behavior; EEG vigilance; mania

资金

  1. Cephalon GmbH
  2. Lilly Deutschland GmbH
  3. Lundbeck
  4. Novartis Pharma GmbH
  5. Wyeth Pharma Deutschland
  6. Sanofi-Aventis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and mania show broad symptom overlap, and high comorbidity exists between ADHD and bipolar disorder. This raises the question concerning common neurobiological pathomechanisms and concerning common treatments. Recent findings On genetic, biochemical, electrophysiological, brain morphological and neuropsychological levels, the commonalities of ADHD and mania and the commonalities between ADHD and bipolar disorder (independent of manic state) are outlined. An intriguing finding is that both ADHD and mania are characterized by an unstable wakefulness regulation assessed by EEG measures of vigilance, by ratings of sleepiness and by deficits in sustained attention tasks. In both mania and ADHD, this unstable wakefulness regulation is supposed to be a central pathogenetic factor leading to attention deficits and inducing the hyperactive, impulsive and sensation-seeking behavior as an autoregulatory attempt to stabilize wakefulness by increasing external stimulation. Evidence is accumulating to suggest that psychostimulants do not have a high risk of triggering or aggravating mania, but might even be a treatment option in acute mania. Summary ADHD and mania share many symptoms and several pathogenetic aspects. The common belief that stimulants are contraindicated in mania has been challenged, and controlled trials to study the possible antimanic effects of vigilance-stabilizing drugs such as stimulants are justified and necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据