4.4 Article

Tardive dyskinesia and new antipsychotics

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 151-156

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f53132

关键词

antipsychotics; dementia; disruptive behavior disorders; extrapyramidal side effects; schizophrenia; tardive dyskinesia

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 018535] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 074543-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review To provide an update on tardive dyskinesia rates in patients treated with first-generation or second-generation antipsychotics in studies published since the last systematic review in 2004. Recent findings Across 12 trials (n = 28 051, age 39.7 years, 59.7% male, 70.9% white, followed for 463 925 person-years), the annualized tardive dyskinesia incidence was 3.90% for second-generation antipsychotics and 5.5% for first-generation antipsychotics. Stratified by age, annual tardive dyskinesia incidence rates were 0.35% with second-generation antipsychotics in children, 2.98% with second-generation antipsychotics versus 7.7% with first-generation antipsychotics (P < 0.0001) in adults, and 5.2% with second-generation antipsychotics versus 5.2% with first-generation antipsychotics (P= 0.865) in the elderly (based almost exclusively on one retrospective cohort study). In four adult studies (n = 2088, age 41.2 years, 71.2% male, 62.0% white), tardive dyskinesia prevalence rates were 13.1% for second-generation antipsychotics, 15.6% for antipsychotic-free patients, and 32.4% for first-generation antipsychotics (P< 0.0001). Summary Current evidence supports a lower tardive dyskinesia risk for second-generation antipsychotics than for first-generation antipsychotics. Tardive dyskinesia incidence was higher with second-generation antipsychotics than previously reported, possibly due to recent studies with relatively short mean durations and use of nonstandard tardive dyskinesia definitions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据