4.1 Review

Cochlear implantation and single-sided deafness

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000080

关键词

bone-anchored hearing aid; cochlear implant; contralateral routing of sound; osseointegrated implant; single-sided deafness; sound localization; speech discrimination; unilateral hearing loss

资金

  1. National Institutes on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health [P50DC000242]
  2. Lions Clubs International Foundation
  3. Iowa Lions Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Recently, more patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have been undergoing cochlear implantation. We review recent studies and case reports to provide an overview of the efficacy of cochlear implants to rehabilitate patients with SSD with regards to sound localization, speech discrimination, and tinnitus suppression. Recent findings There are a growing number of studies evaluating the effect of cochlear implantation for rehabilitation of the deficits associated with SSD over the past several years as more centers offer this treatment modality to patients with SSD. Although individual studies have few patients and are underpowered, the vast majority report improvement in sound localization, speech understanding in quiet and noise, and tinnitus. In some cases, the outcomes with cochlear implant appear superior to those achieved with other devices, including contralateral routing of sound devices and osseointegrated implants. Summary Although cochlear implant is not a Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for SSD, several recent studies show improvements in speech understanding, sound localization, and tinnitus. Because of the low number of cases, it is difficult to conclusively compare outcomes achieved with cochlear implants and those provided by other devices. However, on the basis of encouraging early results and the unique ability to restore binaural sound processing, a growing number of centers offer cochlear implants

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据