4.4 Article

FRET based ratiometric Ca2+ imaging to investigate immune-mediated neuronal and axonal damage processes in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 249, 期 -, 页码 8-15

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.04.005

关键词

EAE/MS; Two-photon laser scanning microscopy; Intravital microscopy; FRET; Ca2+ imaging neurodegeneration

资金

  1. Gemeinnutzige Hertie-Stiftung
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB-TRR128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Irreversible axonal and neuronal damage are the correlate of disability in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS). A sustained increase of cytoplasmic free [Ca2+] is a common upstream event of many neuronal and axonal damage processes and could represent an early and potentially reversible step. New method: We propose a method to specifically analyze the neurodegenerative aspects of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) imaging of neuronal and axonal Ca2+ dynamics by two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM). Results: Using the genetically encoded Ca2+ sensor TN-XXL expressed in neurons and their corresponding axons, we confirm the increase of cytoplasmic free [Ca2+] in axons and neurons of autoimmune inflammatory lesions compared to those in non-inflamed brains. We show that these relative [Ca2+] increases were associated with immune-neuronal interactions. Comparison with existing methods: In contrast to Ca2+-sensitive dyes the use of a genetically encoded Ca2+ sensor allows reliable intraaxonal free [Ca2+] measurements in living anesthetized mice in health and disease. This method detects early axonal damage processes in contrast to e.g. cell/axon morphology analysis, that rather detects late signs of neurodegeneration. Conclusions: Thus, we describe a method to analyze and monitor early neuronal damage processes in the brain in vivo. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据