4.1 Article

Regulation of cell fate and patterning in the developing mammalian cochlea

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283303347

关键词

atoh1; hair cell; organ of Corti; pillar cell; Sox2

资金

  1. National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders at the National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review A significant proportion of hearing loss and deafness is caused by defects in the structure or function of cells within the organ of Corti. Identification of the molecular factors that regulate the development of this structure should provide valuable insights regarding inner ear formation and the signaling pathways that underlie congenital auditory deficits. In addition, targeted modulation of these same factors could be developed as therapies for hair cell regeneration. Recent findings Results from experiments using transgenic and mutant mice, as well as in-vitro techniques, have identified genes and signaling pathways that are required to either specify unique auditory cell types, such as hair cells or supporting cells, or to generate the highly ordered cellular pattern that is characteristic for the organ of Corti. In particular, the hedgehog and fibroblast growth factor signaling pathways modulate the formation of the progenitor cells that will give rise to the organ of Corti. SRY-box containing gene 2, a transcription factor that is required for the formation of the cochlear progenitor cell population, has paradoxically been shown to also act as an inhibitor of hair cell development. Finally, the motor protein myosin II regulates extension of the organ of Corti and the alignment of hair cells and supporting cells into ordered rows. Summary A better understanding of the signaling pathways that direct different aspects of cochlear development, such as specific of cell fates or cellular patterning, offers the potential to identify new pathways or molecules that could be targeted for therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据