4.1 Article

Gap junctions and connexins in the inner ear: their roles in homeostasis and deafness

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32830e20b0

关键词

cochlea; connexin; deafness; gap junction; inner ear

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. Deafness Research UK
  3. Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID)
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D009669/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/D009669/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Mutations in GJB2 and GJB6, the genes encoding the gap-junction proteins Connexin 26 and connexin 30, are the most common cause of autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness in many populations across the world. In this review, we discuss current ideas about the roles of gap junctions in the inner ear and the implications of connexin mutations on auditory function. Recent findings In recent years, a complex picture of the roles of gap junctions in cochlear physiology emerged. Rather than being mere conduits for the circulation of potassium ions in the inner ear, gap junctions have been implicated in intercellular signaling among nonsensory cells and may be involved in the maintenance of the endothelial barrier in the stria vascularis. Studies of mutant channels and mouse models for connexin-related deafness have provided valuable insights into some of the mechanisms by which connexin dysfunction causes cochlear degeneration. They have also identified potential therapeutic interventions for specific connexin mutations, such as the restoration of normal connexin 26 protein levels in GJB6-associated deafness. Summary Despite recent advances, a better understanding of the complexity of gap-junctional communication in the inner ear and the structure-function relationships of connexin proteins is required for the development of mechanism-based treatments of connexin-associated hearing loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据