4.1 Review

Cardiac xenotransplantation: progress and challenges

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 148-154

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283509120

关键词

alpha 1,3 galactosyltransferase gene-knockout; antibody-mediated rejection; complement regulatory proteins; organ transplantation; transgenic; xenotransplantation

资金

  1. NIH [AI66310]
  2. CBRC from University College London
  3. Mayo Clinic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Cardiac xenotransplantation (CXTx) remains a promising approach to alleviate the chronic shortage of donor hearts. This review summarizes recent results of heterotopic and orthotopic CXTx, highlights the role of non-Gal antibody in xenograft rejection, and discusses challenges to clinical orthotopic CXTx. Recent findings Pigs mutated in the alpha 1,3 galactosyltransferase gene (GTKO pigs) are devoid of the galactose alpha 1,3 galactose (alpha Gal) carbohydrate antigen. This situation effectively eliminates any role for anti-Gal antibody in GTKO cardiac xenograft rejection. Survival of heterotopic GTKO cardiac xenografts in nonhuman primates continues to increase. GTKO graft rejection commonly involves vascular antibody deposition and variable complement deposition. Non-Gal antibody responses to porcine antigens associated with inflammation, complement, and hemostatic regulation and to new carbohydrate antigens have been identified. Their contribution to rejection remains under investigation. Orthotopic CXTx is limited by early perioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction (PCXD). However, hearts affected by PCXD recover full cardiac function and orthotopic survival up to 2 months without rejection has been reported. Summary CXTx remains a promising technology for treating end-stage cardiac failure. Genetic modification of the donor and refinement of immunosuppressive regimens have extended heterotopic cardiac xenograft survival from minutes to in excess of 8 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据