4.1 Review

Preservation strategies to reduce ischemic injury in kidney transplantation: pharmacological and genetic approaches

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 180-187

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283446b1d

关键词

cold storage; ex-vivo treatment; gene therapy; pharmacological supplementation; RNAi

资金

  1. Conseil General de la Vienne
  2. Region Poitou Charentes
  3. Banque Tarneaud, Poitiers
  4. CHU de Poitiers
  5. Inserm
  6. Societe Francophone de Transplantation
  7. French Foundation of Transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review In the current graft shortage, it is paramount to improve the quality of transplanted organs. Organ preservation represents an underused therapeutic window with great potential to reduce ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and improve graft quality. Herein, we review strategies using this window as well as other promising work targeting IRI pathways using pharmacological treatments and gene therapy. Recent findings We highlight studies using molecules administered during kidney preservation to target key components of IRI such as inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity and the coagulation pathway. We further expose recent studies of gene therapy directed against inflammation or apoptosis during cold storage. Other pathways with potential therapeutic molecules are cited. Summary The use of cold preservation as a therapeutic window to deliver pharmacological or gene therapy treatments can significantly improve both short-term and long-term graft outcomes. Even if human gene therapy remains hampered by the quantity of agent needed and the potential harmfulness of the vector, it clearly offers a wide array of possibilities for the future. Although gene therapy is still too immature, we expose pharmacological strategies which can readily be applied to the clinic and improve both transplantation success rates and the patients' quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据