4.1 Review

The impact of Th17 cells on transplant rejection and the induction of tolerance

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 456-461

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32833b9bfb

关键词

IL-17; plasticity; rejection; Tregs

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. Fundacion Marques de Valdecilla-IFIMAV
  5. Medical Research Council [G0800842] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [G0800842] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This review aims to provide an overview of the latest evidence for the involvement of Th17 cells in the rejection of solid organ allografts. It will also consider the implications of the relationship between the differentiation pathways of Th17 and regulatory T cells (Tregs), as well as their plasticity in the context of transplantation tolerance. Recent findings In the absence of the Th1 lineage in vivo, Th17 cells are capable of rejecting cardiac allografts, showing the capacity of Th17 cells to cause allograft rejection, at least in experimental models. Th17 cells are relatively unsusceptible to suppression by Tregs, although this may be context dependent. Furthermore, addition of inflammatory signals to a Treg-inducing environment leads to Th17 development and established Tregs can be converted to Th17 cells under inflammatory conditions. Summary The capacity of Th17 cells to cause allograft rejection is becoming increasingly clear. However, the role and contribution of Th17 cells in allograft rejection in the presence of the full orchestra of T helper cells remains elusive. The apparent resistance of Th17 to be suppressed by Tregs may pose a hurdle for effective immunosuppression and tolerance inducing protocols. Furthermore, the close developmental pathways of Th17 and Tregs and the ability of Tregs to convert into Th17 cells in the presence of inflammatory signals may impede the establishment of specific unresponsiveness to donor alloantigens in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据